Saturday, January 19, 2013

The Purpose Of The Second Amendment



I'm posting this because I got into a heated exchange with an alleged "friend of the family" of a victim of Sandy Hook. This woman argued that all guns need to banned, that in a "civil society" there is no place for citizens to own weapons. She then stated that my right to go hunting does not take presidence over the life of a child. That set just set me off.


Let me state this to my readers real quick.

1.) Our right are God-given, or if you don't believe in God then it means we are born with them. The government does not give us our rights. This is important because once you realize that the government doesn't give us our right then you will also realize that they cannot take away our rights. There is a movement to deceive people and twist the Constitution around so that people think that we get our rights from the government, that instead of the government being for the people that we are to be for the government. Open your eyes to how the term "public servant" is now replaced with "officials" and "authorities".

2.) The Constitution/Bill of Rights doesn't give us our rights. It merely confirms and upholds them. We are born with our rights, they are God given.

3.) The Second Amendment is not about hunting, nor is about defending your home from a break-in.

"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. -The Second Amendment"

Do you read anything about hunting or protecting your home from break-ins or criminals in this? It's because the Second Amendment is not about any of these things. Instead, the founding fathers were paranoid with the thought that in just a few short generations the nation would fall back into tyranny, that there would be what we would call a government coup or take-over, and our liberties would be lost. So they believed that the citizens shall be armed as a last defense in hopes that they could defend themselves against a corrupt government and restore the nation.

Gun control is not about guns. It's about control. Severe gun control makes sure that citizens do not have access to the same weapons that our government has and thus having no hope to defend ourselves from a corrupt government.  Read the last three words of the Second Amendment until it finally sinks in.

For the young people out there, teens and young adults, there is a movement to target you because these people know you are the future. However, they are deceiving you into thinking the world is perfect or that we could even create a perfect world. They don't want you to know the purpose of the Second Amendment. They don't want you to know that the founding fathers were absolutely paranoid that "the American experiment" would fail and the nation sink back into tyranny. So please don't be deceived. You young people are the future. Just make sure that you remain educated and not allow emotional please and tragedies to blind you from the big picture.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

understood. well-taken. few argue this. i was elated that the District of Columbia's ban was overturned in 2011 (?)...BUT - i think the issue is specifically, the killing capacity an assault rifle has. i think THAT is what has the gun control camp in stitches. im not totally opposed to SOME measure of control here (depending on the details). many school shooters are NOT insane. psychopaths, yes, but not technically insane. their use of an assault rifle would make the difference between killing two kids as opposed to more than 10. and, their background checks would easily clear. but this goes beyond schools - what about drug runners, human traffiking...? i doubt they are relying on a sig sauer and opt instead for the big stuff! i do believe in protecting our rights. if not our government, who knows, maybe the chinese, or mexican drug gangs will cause harm in our borders (as if we dont have enough from homegrown shooters). but the people - putting pressure on the current government - have responded. many want restrictions and i can surely understand why. i do not think this is an effort to disarm the nation.

DocConjure said...

@ Anonymous,

Nope. It has nothing to do with the killing capacity. In the time of the founding fathers, they had canons and grenades.

Any talk of banning ARs or limiting magazines or what not only serves to hurt the citizens and to subvert the 2nd amendment. Because the 2nd amendment is there so the citizens can protect themselves against a corrupt goverment. If you ban these guns you will only prevent citizens from getting them. The government will still be using them.

I guess you didn't do what i asked, as in read the last three words of the second amendment.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Search This Blog

Loading...